The Most Successful Reconciliation of Conflicting Principles
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research
2026-07-13
\[ \begin{aligned} \mathcal{L} = \sum_k\left(\overline{L}_{k,L}i\hat{D}L_{k,L}+\overline{Q}_{k,L}i\hat{D}Q_{k,L} + \sum_{\psi=\ell,\nu,u,d}\overline{\psi}_{k,R}i\hat{D}\psi_{k,R}\right) -\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu} - \frac{1}{4}G^i_{\mu\nu}G^{i,\mu\nu} \\ + |D_{\mu}\varphi|^2-\frac{\lambda^2}{2}\left(|\varphi|^2-\frac{v^2}{2}\right)^2\\ -\sum_{k,j}\left(\lambda_{kj}^\ell\overline{L}_{k,L}\ell_{j,R}\varphi +\lambda_{kj}^\nu\overline{L}_{k,L}\nu_{j,R}\varphi_c +\lambda_{kj}^d\overline{Q}_{k,L}d_{j,R}\varphi +\lambda_{kj}^u\overline{Q}_{k,L}u_{j,R}\varphi_c+\textrm{ э.с.}\right), \end{aligned} \]
Great T-shirt print.
Easy enough?
Maxwell’s move: two phenomena became one field.
| Old language | Unified language |
|---|---|
| electric field | electromagnetic field |
| magnetic field | electromagnetic field |
| separate phenomena | one relativistic field |
A charged particle flies past a magnet with nonzero speed \(v\).
What force acts now?
| What to compare | Electromagnetic | Weak |
|---|---|---|
| Range | long range | very short range, \(\sim 10^{-18}\) m |
| Carrier mass | \(m_\gamma = 0\) | \(\approx 100\) GeV |
| Low-energy strength | strong at everyday scales | about \(10^7\)–\(10^8\) times weaker |
| Parity | conserves | violates |
| Particle identity | keeps particle type | can change particle type |
Estimate the carrier mass: \[ M_W \sim \frac{g}{\sqrt{G_F}} \sim 100\ \mathrm{GeV} \]
Estimate range of the interaction: \[ R \sim \frac{1}{M_W} \sim 10^{-18}\ \mathrm{m} \]
James Clerk Maxwell created a theory of electromagnetism by unifying electricity and magnetism.
Maxwell’s theory is incompatible with Galilean relativity but compatible with Einstein’s relativity. Thus, \[ \mathbf{E},\mathbf{B}\to A^\mu \]
The principle of least action gives a prescription: \[ i\partial_\mu\to iD_\mu=i\partial_\mu+qA_\mu \]
Thus, a free Lagrangian \[ \mathcal{L}=\overline{\psi}(i\gamma^\mu\partial_\mu-m)\psi \]
becomes an interacting Lagrangian: \[ \mathcal{L}=\overline{\psi}(i\gamma^\mu D_\mu-m)\psi = \overline{\psi}(i\gamma^\mu\partial_\mu-m)\psi - q\overline{\psi}\gamma^\mu \psi A_\mu \]
\(X=x-x_q(t)\)
\(E_x=\dfrac{(1-\beta^2)X}{\left[X^2+(1-\beta^2)y^2\right]^{3/2}}\)
\(E_y=\dfrac{(1-\beta^2)y}{\left[X^2+(1-\beta^2)y^2\right]^{3/2}}\)
The same principle for a charged spin-0 field: \[ \mathcal{L}_0=(\partial_\mu\phi^*)(\partial^\mu\phi)-m^2\phi^*\phi-\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}. \]
Make the theory gauge invariant by replacing \(\partial_\mu\to D_\mu\): \[ \begin{aligned} D_\mu&=\partial_\mu+iqA_\mu,\\ \mathcal{L}&=(D_\mu\phi)^*(D^\mu\phi)-m^2\phi^*\phi-\frac{1}{4}F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}. \end{aligned} \]
Expanding the covariant derivatives gives \[ \begin{aligned} \mathcal{L}=\mathcal{L}_0 &-iqA^\mu\phi^*(\partial_\mu\phi) +iq(\partial_\mu\phi^*)A^\mu\phi\\ &+q^2\phi^*\phi A^\mu A_\mu . \end{aligned} \]
Gauge invariance predicts the interaction between \(\phi\) and \(A_\mu\)!
If symmetries give conservation laws, perhaps interactions are also dictated by symmetry.
Salam and Ward, 1961

Experiments show that all these masses are equal to, or proportional to, one another.
\[ \nabla^2\mathbf B=\lambda_L^{-2}\mathbf B,\qquad \lambda_L=\sqrt{\frac{m}{\mu_0 n_s q^2}} \]
\[ \mathbf B(x)=\mathbf B_0 e^{-x/\lambda_L},\qquad \nabla\times\mathbf J_s=-\frac{1}{\mu_0\lambda_L^2}\mathbf B \]
\[ U_B=\int\frac{B^2}{2\mu_0}\,dV,\qquad F_z=-\frac{\partial U_B}{\partial z} \]
\[ p_B=\frac{B^2}{2\mu_0},\qquad F_z=mg \]
The Higgs condensate creates a gap in the spectrum in two different ways.
Vector bosons: Meissner mechanism
Fermions: coupled chiral waves
